Research
The Cost of Borrowing Across Europe (2026)
How much a consumer loan really costs across nine European markets: the representative effective APR by country, from about 8% in the Netherlands to nearly 80% in Poland, from Credano's live lender data.
Cite this research
Sampsa Vainio (2026). "The Cost of Borrowing Across Europe (2026)". Credano. Retrieved from https://credano.eu/research/cost-of-borrowing-europe
Report highlights
- The cost of consumer credit varies enormously across Europe: the representative effective APR ranges from about 8% in the Netherlands and Italy to nearly 80% in Poland.
- The gap is driven by product mix: multi-year bank instalment loans in Western Europe versus short-term personal loans from non-bank lenders in Central and Eastern Europe.
- Spain (53 lenders) and Poland (42) are the deepest markets Credano tracks; Czechia, Lithuania and Italy the thinnest (3–4 each).
- Across all nine markets, Credano tracks 151 active consumer lenders.
The headline interest rate on a loan rarely tells you what it actually costs. Fees, term length, and the type of product all feed into the effective annual rate a borrower really pays. Using the representative examples lenders advertise on Credano across nine European markets, this analysis measures that effective rate, and finds it varies more than five-fold from one country to the next.
The short version: a representative consumer loan carries an effective APR of around 8% in the Netherlands and Italy, but close to 80% in Poland. Almost all of that difference comes down to what kind of credit dominates each market.
Representative effective APR by market
For every active lender, we derived the effective annual rate implied by its published representative example (principal, monthly payment, and term). The table below shows the median across active lenders in each market. See the methodology note for how this is calculated and its limits.
| Market | Active lenders | Representative effective APR | Typical term |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poland | 42 | ≈ 79% | 12 months |
| Spain | 53 | ≈ 71% | 12 months |
| Romania | 16 | ≈ 63% | 12 months |
| Czechia | 3 | ≈ 63% | 12 months |
| Latvia | 8 | ≈ 62% | 12 months |
| Estonia | 16 | ≈ 56% | 12 months |
| Lithuania | 3 | ≈ 31% | 12 months |
| Italy | 4 | ≈ 8% | 54 months |
| Netherlands | 6 | ≈ 8% | 48 months |
Czechia, Lithuania, and Italy are based on only three to four active lenders each, so treat those figures as indicative. We are expanding our coverage of these markets and will refine the numbers as more data comes in.
The divide is about product mix, not geography
The five-fold spread is not really a story about national character or even regulation. It is about which kind of credit dominates each market.
- In the Netherlands and Italy, the representative examples are multi-year instalment loans, typical terms of four to five years, offered largely by banks and consumer-finance houses. Spread over that horizon, effective rates sit in single digits.
- In Poland, Spain, Romania, and the Baltics, the representative examples are dominated by short-term personal loans from non-bank lenders (not banks), typically repaid within twelve months. These carry much higher effective annual rates, even when the absolute euro cost of a small, short loan is modest.
In other words, a Dutch borrower and a Polish borrower are usually not pricing the same product. Comparing a multi-year bank loan to a short-term personal loan on APR alone overstates how differently the two countries treat borrowers, but it accurately captures how expensive short-term credit is on an annualised basis, wherever it is offered.
Where comparison shopping matters most
The practical takeaway is that shopping around pays off most in the high-APR, short-term markets, and those are exactly the markets with the most lenders. Poland (42 active lenders) and Spain (53) combine high headline rates with deep competition, so the gap between the cheapest and most expensive offer for the same loan is widest there. In thin markets like Czechia or Lithuania, there is simply less to compare.
Across the nine markets, Credano tracks 151 active consumer lenders in total.
Methodology
For each active lender in each market, we take the representative example the lender publishes (on its own website and on Credano), the loan amount, the monthly payment, and the term in months, and solve the standard annuity equation for the implied monthly interest rate, then annualise it to an effective APR. Because this is a rate, not a currency amount, it is directly comparable across markets that use different currencies (PLN, CZK, RON, and the euro).
We discard any example whose monthly payment and term do not reconcile with its stated total repayable (a tolerance of 3%), which removes rounding-only or inconsistent entries. Figures reflect the median across a market's usable examples, as of July 2026.
Three limits are worth stating plainly. First, this is the effective rate implied by lenders' published representative examples, not the official APRC/TAEG each lender would quote on a specific contract, which also folds in mandatory fees. A small number are estimated where a lender does not publish a representative example. Second, where several lenders publish similar representative examples, their implied rates cluster, so the median describes the typical advertised example rather than the average rate an individual borrower is charged. Third, for official bank-lending rates by country, compare with the European Central Bank's consumer-credit interest-rate statistics, linked in the sources.
Credano is a loan comparison website, not a lender. These figures reflect data published by third-party lenders and are provided for information only. The terms any individual borrower receives depend on the lender's own assessment.
Sources
- Credano lender catalogue - representative examples published by listed lenders across 9 markets, accessed July 2026
- European Central Bank - Bank interest rate statistics (loans to households for consumption)
- Eurostat - Household debt and consumer credit statistics